Note
Go to the end to download the full example code. or to run this example in your browser via Binder
Simple example of two-runs fMRI model fitting¶
Here, we will go through a full step-by-step example of fitting a GLM to experimental data and visualizing the results. This is done on two runs of one subject of the FIAC dataset.
For more details on the data, please see experiment 2 in Dehaene-Lambertz et al.[1].
Here are the steps we will go through:
Set up the GLM
Compare run-specific and fixed effects contrasts
Compute a range of contrasts across both runs
Generate a report
Technically, this example shows how to handle two runs that contain the same experimental conditions. The model directly returns a fixed effect of the statistics across the two runs.
Create an output results
in the current working directory.
from pathlib import Path
output_dir = Path.cwd() / "results" / "plot_two_runs_model"
output_dir.mkdir(exist_ok=True, parents=True)
print(f"Output will be saved to: {output_dir}")
Output will be saved to: /home/remi/github/nilearn/nilearn_doc_build/examples/04_glm_first_level/results/plot_two_runs_model
Set up the GLM¶
Inspecting ‘data’, we note that there are two runs. We will retain those two runs in a list of 4D img objects.
from nilearn.datasets import func
data = func.fetch_fiac_first_level()
fmri_imgs = [data["func1"], data["func2"]]
[get_dataset_dir] Dataset found in /home/remi/nilearn_data/fiac_nilearn.glm
Create a mean image for plotting purpose.
The design matrices were pre-computed, we simply put them in a list of DataFrames.
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
design_files = [data["design_matrix1"], data["design_matrix2"]]
design_matrices = [pd.DataFrame(np.load(df)["X"]) for df in design_files]
Initialize and run the GLM¶
First, we need to specify the model before fitting it to the data. Note that a brain mask was provided in the dataset, so that is what we will use.
from nilearn.glm.first_level import FirstLevelModel
fmri_glm = FirstLevelModel(
mask_img=data["mask"],
smoothing_fwhm=5,
minimize_memory=True,
)
Compare run-specific and fixed effects contrasts¶
We can then compare run-specific and fixed effects. Here, we compare the activation produced from each run separately and then the fixed effects version.
cut_coords = [-129, -126, 49]
contrast_id = "DSt_minus_SSt"
Compute the statistics for the first run.
from nilearn import plotting
# Here, we define the contrast of interest for the first run.
# This may differ across runs depending on if the design matrices vary.
contrast_val = [[-1, -1, 1, 1]]
fmri_glm_run_1 = fmri_glm.fit(fmri_imgs[0], design_matrices=design_matrices[0])
summary_statistics_run_1 = fmri_glm_run_1.compute_contrast(
contrast_val,
output_type="all",
)
plotting.plot_stat_map(
summary_statistics_run_1["z_score"],
bg_img=mean_img_,
threshold=3.0,
cut_coords=cut_coords,
title=f"{contrast_id}, first run",
)
/home/remi/github/nilearn/nilearn_doc_build/.tox/doc/lib/python3.9/site-packages/nilearn/glm/contrasts.py:115: UserWarning:
t contrasts should be of length P=13, but it has length 4. The rest of the contrast was padded with zeros.
<nilearn.plotting.displays._slicers.OrthoSlicer object at 0x740cde45da60>
Compute the statistics for the second run.
fmri_glm_run_2 = fmri_glm.fit(fmri_imgs[1], design_matrices=design_matrices[1])
contrast_val = np.array([[-1, -1, 1, 1]])
summary_statistics_run_2 = fmri_glm_run_2.compute_contrast(
contrast_val,
output_type="all",
)
plotting.plot_stat_map(
summary_statistics_run_2["z_score"],
bg_img=mean_img_,
threshold=3.0,
cut_coords=cut_coords,
title=f"{contrast_id}, second run",
)
/home/remi/github/nilearn/nilearn_doc_build/.tox/doc/lib/python3.9/site-packages/nilearn/glm/contrasts.py:115: UserWarning:
t contrasts should be of length P=13, but it has length 4. The rest of the contrast was padded with zeros.
<nilearn.plotting.displays._slicers.OrthoSlicer object at 0x740cdde56fd0>
Compute the fixed effects statistics using the statistical maps of both runs.
We can use compute_fixed_effects
to compute
the fixed effects statistics using the outputs
from the run-specific FirstLevelModel results.
from nilearn.glm.contrasts import compute_fixed_effects
contrast_imgs = [
summary_statistics_run_1["effect_size"],
summary_statistics_run_2["effect_size"],
]
variance_imgs = [
summary_statistics_run_1["effect_variance"],
summary_statistics_run_2["effect_variance"],
]
fixed_fx_contrast, fixed_fx_variance, fixed_fx_stat = compute_fixed_effects(
contrast_imgs,
variance_imgs,
data["mask"],
)
plotting.plot_stat_map(
fixed_fx_stat,
bg_img=mean_img_,
threshold=3.0,
cut_coords=cut_coords,
title=f"{contrast_id}, fixed effects",
)
<nilearn.plotting.displays._slicers.OrthoSlicer object at 0x740cf858bca0>
Not unexpectedly, the fixed effects version displays higher peaks than the input runs. Computing fixed effects enhances the signal-to-noise ratio of the resulting brain maps.
Compute the fixed effects statistics using the preprocessed data of both runs.
A more straightforward alternative to fitting run-specific GLMs,
than combining the results with compute_fixed_effects
,
is to simply fit the GLM to both runs at once.
Since we can assume that the design matrices of both runs have the same columns, in the same order, we can again reuse the first run’s contrast vector.
fmri_glm_multirun = fmri_glm.fit(fmri_imgs, design_matrices=design_matrices)
# We can just define the contrast array for one run and assume
# that the design matrix is the same for the other.
# However, if we want to be safe, we should define each contrast separately,
# and provide it as a list.
contrast_val = [
np.array([[-1, -1, 1, 1]]), # run 1
np.array([[-1, -1, 1, 1]]), # run 2
]
z_map = fmri_glm_multirun.compute_contrast(
contrast_val,
output_type="z_score",
)
plotting.plot_stat_map(
z_map,
bg_img=mean_img_,
threshold=3.0,
cut_coords=cut_coords,
title=f"{contrast_id}, fixed effects",
)
plotting.show()
/home/remi/github/nilearn/nilearn_doc_build/.tox/doc/lib/python3.9/site-packages/nilearn/glm/contrasts.py:115: UserWarning:
t contrasts should be of length P=13, but it has length 4. The rest of the contrast was padded with zeros.
You may note that the results are the same as the first fixed effects analysis, but with a lot less code.
Compute a range of contrasts across both runs¶
It may be useful to investigate a number of contrasts. Therefore, we will move beyond the original contrast of interest and both define and compute several.
Contrast specification
n_columns = design_matrices[0].shape[1]
contrasts = {
"SStSSp_minus_DStDSp": np.array([[1, 0, 0, -1]]),
"DStDSp_minus_SStSSp": np.array([[-1, 0, 0, 1]]),
"DSt_minus_SSt": np.array([[-1, -1, 1, 1]]),
"DSp_minus_SSp": np.array([[-1, 1, -1, 1]]),
"DSt_minus_SSt_for_DSp": np.array([[0, -1, 0, 1]]),
"DSp_minus_SSp_for_DSt": np.array([[0, 0, -1, 1]]),
"Deactivation": np.array([[-1, -1, -1, -1, 4]]),
"Effects_of_interest": np.eye(n_columns)[:5, :], # An F-contrast
}
Next, we compute and plot the statistics for these new contrasts.
print("Computing contrasts...")
for index, (contrast_id, contrast_val) in enumerate(contrasts.items()):
print(f" Contrast {index + 1:02g} out of {len(contrasts)}: {contrast_id}")
# Estimate the contasts.
z_map = fmri_glm.compute_contrast(contrast_val, output_type="z_score")
# Write the resulting stat images to file.
z_image_path = output_dir / f"{contrast_id}_z_map.nii.gz"
z_map.to_filename(z_image_path)
Computing contrasts...
Contrast 01 out of 8: SStSSp_minus_DStDSp
/home/remi/github/nilearn/nilearn_doc_build/examples/04_glm_first_level/plot_two_runs_model.py:227: UserWarning:
One contrast given, assuming it for all 2 runs
Contrast 02 out of 8: DStDSp_minus_SStSSp
Contrast 03 out of 8: DSt_minus_SSt
Contrast 04 out of 8: DSp_minus_SSp
Contrast 05 out of 8: DSt_minus_SSt_for_DSp
Contrast 06 out of 8: DSp_minus_SSp_for_DSt
Contrast 07 out of 8: Deactivation
/home/remi/github/nilearn/nilearn_doc_build/.tox/doc/lib/python3.9/site-packages/nilearn/glm/contrasts.py:115: UserWarning:
t contrasts should be of length P=13, but it has length 5. The rest of the contrast was padded with zeros.
Contrast 08 out of 8: Effects_of_interest
/home/remi/github/nilearn/nilearn_doc_build/.tox/doc/lib/python3.9/site-packages/nilearn/glm/contrasts.py:166: UserWarning:
Running approximate fixed effects on F statistics.
Generating a report¶
Since we have already computed the FirstLevelModel and have a number of contrasts, we can quickly create a summary report.
report = fmri_glm_multirun.generate_report(
contrasts,
bg_img=mean_img_,
title="two-runs fMRI model fitting",
)
/home/remi/github/nilearn/nilearn_doc_build/.tox/doc/lib/python3.9/site-packages/nilearn/_utils/helpers.py:94: UserWarning:
Contrasts will be padded with 9 column(s) of zeros.
/home/remi/github/nilearn/nilearn_doc_build/.tox/doc/lib/python3.9/site-packages/nilearn/_utils/helpers.py:94: UserWarning:
Contrasts will be padded with 8 column(s) of zeros.
/home/remi/github/nilearn/nilearn_doc_build/.tox/doc/lib/python3.9/site-packages/nilearn/reporting/glm_reporter.py:545: UserWarning:
One contrast given, assuming it for all 2 runs
We have several ways to access the report:
# report # This report can be viewed in a notebook
# report.open_in_browser()
# or we can save as an html file
# report.save_as_html(output_dir / 'report.html')
References¶
Total running time of the script: (0 minutes 54.788 seconds)
Estimated memory usage: 1010 MB